|
Photos too small? Click on photos, screenshots and diagrams in articles to open a Larger View gallery.
| Sounding OffSam InglisPeople + Opinion : ReaderZone
Make me a record that sounds worse than My Bloody Valentine, and I'll make you a star. Sam Inglis
Recently I've been
putting a lot of effort into a project I call 'Trying To Like My Bloody
Valentine'. In case the name doesn't make it clear, this involves
listening to records by Kevin Shields' shoegazing noise merchants, and
wondering what it would be like to find them enjoyable. I
know I ought to like My Bloody Valentine. My colleagues like My Bloody
Valentine. Lots of people who have better taste than me like My Bloody
Valentine, and I'm sure they aren't deluded. Sometimes I can even catch
glimpses of the promised land, fragments of something beautiful and
strange. But try as I might, I just can't overcome that horrible drum
machine, and the unintelligible words, and the wispy little-girl vocals
buried in the mix, and... well, Project Trying To Like My Bloody
Valentine has so far crashed and burned on a scale not seen since
Mission: Listen To Unknown Pleasures All The Way Through, or Become A
Fall Fan In 12 Easy Steps. All of which got me
thinking about the point of so-called 'lo-fi' recording. To some
degree, we're probably all happy to put up with a few technical
imperfections in a recording that captures a stunning performance. But
there are lots of cult albums that go much further than this, flying in
the face of our preconceptions about what sounds 'good' or 'right'.
With MBV, I suspect this is the result of a conscious production
choice; in other cases it might be down to ineptitude, laziness or poor
equipment. Whatever the reason, some records are just really hard to
listen to. Like those early Will Oldham albums that sound as though
they were recorded on a broken Creative Labs soundcard. Or the Red
Crayola, whose instrumental skills made my five-year-old sound like
Paganini. Or, to my ears at least, My Bloody Valentine. I
wonder if these albums actually owe their cult status, at least in
part, to the fact that they are so unfriendly or unfamiliar to the
listener. They appeal, I think, to a particular kind of fan who wears
the difficulty of his music as a badge of pride. Let's call him James. James
is one of the gifted few who can hear genius at work even when it's
masked by trivial distractions like tuning, or digital glitches. While
the rest of us fail to make it past the gates, James is feasting on the
delights within, because James has special faculties of artistic
divination. James likes My Bloody Valentine. (James also spends a lot
of time updating his blog, and is on nodding terms with several members
of Animal Collective.) Let's take this a bit
further. My suspicion is that even James didn't exactly find it easy to
enjoy My Bloody Valentine at first. This sort of thing takes stamina.
And after he'd made the effort to listen to Loveless enough times for
such a strange sound-world to become familiar, he'd made an investment
in that album. After all, he'd had to put the damn thing on eight times
in a row in order to tap into the spirit of what Kevin Shields was
trying to do. He was hardly going to turn round and say "You know what?
Thinking about it, it kind of sucked all along." Maybe,
in other words, it doesn't actually matter whether there is any genius
involved, as long as your music is sufficiently painful to listen to.
Perhaps it isn't necessary for a truly lo-fi album to have brilliant
songs, a unique poetic vision and a guest appearance from Billy
Childish. Just possibly, the easy path to immortality is to make your
album sound unlistenably weird. On purpose. So
here's an idea for you. Next time you're recording some music, don't
worry about boring things like songwriting, or acoustic treatment, or
playing in time. Pop the mic. Clip the preamp. Record in the box room
with the vacuum cleaner running. Choose GM sounds at random, invite
Pete Doherty to sing backing vocals, and mix the whole thing on a Ouija
board. Make it hard enough on the ear, and maybe no-one will care what
your songs are like. They'll be too busy congratulating themselves on
having unwrapped the present to notice whether there is anything
inside. I'd try it myself, only I don't want James coming to my gigs. 
About The Author When
not being Features Editor of Sound On Sound, Sam Inglis spends most of
his time dreaming about making a record one-tenth as good as Loveless.
Published in SOS December 2008 |